Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:44

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Pediatrician Reveals 1 Food She Wants More Parents to Feed Kids - TODAY.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
AI Cracks Secret Language of Sticky Proteins Linked to Alzheimer’s - SciTechDaily
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
40 Father’s Day Gifts He’ll Wanna Brag About - BuzzFeed
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
No One in the Movies Stays Dead Anymore - Yahoo
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Brad Pitt Wears a Cobalt Blue Velvet Blazer and Barrel Jeans with Ines de Ramon - instyle.com
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why do so many guys love anime girls?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
SpaceX’s Transporter 14 launch today will carry more than 150 capsules of DNA, human remains - Space